Skip to main content

Table 3 Selected feature sets for pairwise classifications with accuracies ≥ 80%

From: Radiomic signatures with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes: initial results

Luminal A vs. luminal B

(MI)

Luminal B vs. TN

(Fisher)

Luminal B vs. all others

(POE)

HER2-enriched vs. all others

(MI)

S(3,3)SumAverg

S(2,2)SumEntrp

S(5,-5)DifEntrp

45dgr_LngREmph

S(2,-2)SumAverg

S(0,1)Contrast

GeoW7

Variance

GeoW9

S(5,5)InvDfMom

Teta1

S(1,1)SumOfSqs

S(1,-1)SumOfSqs

S(2,2)SumAverg

GrKurtosis

Teta4

S(1,0)SumOfSqs

S(4,4)InvDfMom

S(0,1)InvDfMom

S(5,5)SumAverg

S(1,1)Contrast

S(2,-2)Contrast

GeoE12

Vertl_ShrtREmp

S(2,-2)DifEntrp

S(0,2)Entropy

S(4,-4)SumEntrp

  1. HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HR hormone receptor, MI mutual information, POE probability of error and average correlation, TN triple negative