Skip to main content

Table 4 Detailed characteristics of included studies

From: Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Number of patients

Disease stage

NLR cutoff value

Median age (years)

Breast cancer subtype (%)

Grade (%)

Postmenopausal (%)

Median follow-up (years)

ER+

HER-2+

Triple negative

Grade 1–2

Grade 3

Asano et al. [12]

2016

61

Early

3.0

n/a

0

0

100

72

28

36

3.1

Azab et al. [23]

2012

316

Mixed

3.3

n/a

83

17

n/a

70

30

n/a

3.8

Azab et al. [13]

2013

437

Mixed

3.3

64

76

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

5

Bozkurt et al. [24]

2015

85

Early

2.0

n/a

0

0

100

31

69

69

n/a

Dirican et al. [25]

2015

1527

Mixed

4.0

n/a

68

17

n/a

80

20

44

2.5

Forget et al. [10]

2014

720

Early

3.3

n/a

84

9

n/a

61

39

n/a

5.8

Hong et al. [29]

2015

487

Early

1.9

55

67

21

19

73

27

42

4.6

Jia et al. [14]

2015

1570

Early

2.0

47

n/a

22

14

62

38

n/a

6.6

Koh et al. [8]

2014

157

Early

2.3

44

n/a

0

0

80

20

n/a

1.8

Koh et al. [15]

2015

1435

Mixed

5.0

52

55

36

100

56

44

n/a

n/a

Nakano et al. [9]

2015

167

Early

2.5

58

78

18

n/a

80

20

25

7.2a

Noh et al. [26]

2013

442

Early

2.5

50

71

29

18

71

29

n/a

5.9

Pistelli et al. [27]

2015

90

Early

3.0

53

0

0

100

10

90

40

4.5

Rimando et al. [28]

2016

461

Mixed

3.8

58

74

n/a

n/a

51

49

n/a

5.1

Yao et al. [11]

2014

608

Early

2.6

53

66

25

16

n/a

n/a

48

3.5

  1. ER estrogen receptor, n/a not available, NLR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte
  2. aMean follow-up