Skip to main content
Download PDF

Macroscopic optical physiological parameters correlate with microscopic proliferation and vessel area breast cancer signatures

Breast Cancer Research volume 17, Article number: 72 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Non-invasive diffuse optical tomography (DOT) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) can detect and characterize breast cancer and predict tumor responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, even in patients with radiographically dense breasts. However, the relationship between measured optical parameters and pathological biomarker information needs to be further studied to connect information from optics to traditional clinical cancer biology. Thus we investigate how optically measured physiological parameters in malignant tumors such as oxy-, deoxy-hemoglobin concentration, tissue blood oxygenation, and metabolic rate of oxygen correlate with microscopic histopathological biomarkers from the same malignant tumors, e.g., Ki67 proliferation markers, CD34 stained vasculature markers and nuclear morphology.

Methods

In this pilot study, we investigate correlations of macroscopic physiological parameters of malignant tumors measured by diffuse optical technologies with microscopic histopathological biomarkers of the same tumors, i.e., the Ki67 proliferation marker, the CD34 stained vascular properties marker, and nuclear morphology.

Results

The tumor-to-normal relative ratio of Ki67-positive nuclei is positively correlated with DOT-measured relative tissue blood oxygen saturation (R = 0.89, p-value: 0.001), and lower tumor-to-normal deoxy-hemoglobin concentration is associated with higher expression level of Ki67 nuclei (p-value: 0.01). In a subset of the Ki67-negative group (defined by the 15 % threshold), an inverse correlation between Ki67 expression level and mammary metabolic rate of oxygen was observed (R = −0.95, p-value: 0.014). Further, CD34 stained mean-vessel-area in tumor is positively correlated with tumor-to-normal total-hemoglobin and oxy-hemoglobin concentration. Finally, we find that cell nuclei tend to have more elongated shapes in less oxygenated DOT-measured environments.

Conclusions

Collectively, the pilot data are consistent with the notion that increased blood is supplied to breast cancers, and it also suggests that less conversion of oxy- to deoxy-hemoglobin occurs in more proliferative cancers. Overall, the observations corroborate expectations that macroscopic measurements of breast cancer physiology using DOT and DCS can reveal microscopic pathological properties of breast cancer and hold potential to complement pathological biomarker information.

Introduction

Diffuse optical imaging and spectroscopy measure deep tissue physiology in vivo using low-power non-ionizing light, and in recent years, cancer research with diffuse optics has become more quantitative [1–3]. Several features of diffuse optics make the technology appealing for use in patients with breast cancer, including technical simplicity, portability, soft compression of the breast, non-invasiveness and the cost. Furthermore, the technology has been demonstrated to detect/characterize breast tissue properties regardless of patient age and breast radiographic density [4–8], and it can be used to monitor patient responses to therapy continuously at the bedside [9–14].

The primary endogenous physiological information derived from diffuse optical measurements is oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin concentration, tissue blood oxygenation [1, 3, 5–8, 14, 15], blood flow [13, 16], and water and lipid concentration [1, 3, 5–8, 14, 15]. More recently, tissue temperature, the binding state of water [7, 10, 17–19] and collagen [20, 21] are proving to be interesting biomarkers. Several groups have reported contrast between breast cancer, benign lesions, and normal tissues based on these physiological parameters [6, 22–24], and tumor responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have been monitored successfully [9, 11, 13, 14, 25–27]. Some of these responses predict complete versus non-complete pathologically determined response among patients during the early stages of NAC [9, 28, 29] and even before therapy [30].

In this paper we examine how macroscopic diffuse optical parameters are related to microscopic pathology information that clinicians typically employ for treatment strategy decisions. In clinical practice, tumor samples are characterized based on microscopic analyses of immunohistologically stained biopsy specimens. For example, Ki67 expression level in cell nuclei is often assessed to quantify proliferation of cancer cells [31, 32], and CD34 staining is used for quantifying endothelial cells of micro-vessels in order to assess angiogenesis in tumors [33]. A few studies have compared microscopic markers to the parameters derived from diffuse optical images [30, 34–39]. Total hemoglobin concentration in breast cancer, for example, has been positively correlated with vascular properties such as micro-vessel density [37–39]. Although correlations between Ki67 proliferation marker expression level and diffuse optically measured physiological parameters have not been reported, several positron emission tomography (PET) studies have found correlation between Ki67 cancer proliferation level and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) metabolism [40–42], but a different study reported no correlation between Ki67 and 18F-FDG uptake, and a marginal correlation between Ki67 expression level and tumor-to-background ratio of the uptake of the hypoxia-avid compound 18F-labeled fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) [43]. The authors of the latter paper concluded that their observations might be due to alteration of glucose metabolism in cancer that prefers aerobic glycolysis, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect [44]. In the work of Cochet et al. [41], no significant correlation was found between standardized uptake of 18F-FDG and endothelial markers (CD34 and CD105). Note also, tumor blood flow indices defined by these authors correlated positively with the expression of CD34 and CD105 and with the expression of Ki67 [41].

Our pilot study provides a more extensive exploration of the potential connections between tissue parameters obtained from diffuse optical tomography (DOT) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS), and standard histopathological biomarkers derived from the same patient tissues. In previous research we demonstrated that the tumor-to-normal ratio of a variety of parameters in three-dimensional (3-D) DOT images can differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions [6]. Here we focus on malignant tumor properties. Specifically, we investigated how DOT-based physiological parameters in malignant tumors, such as oxyhemoglogin, deoxyhemoglobin concentrations, tissue blood oxygenation, and tumor-to-normal ratio of the mammary metabolic rate of oxygen (rMMRO2) (derived from hemoglobin concentration and DCS blood flow data) correlate with microscopic histopathological biomarkers from the same malignant tumors, i.e., with the Ki67 proliferation marker, the CD34 stained vasculature marker, nuclear morphology and with hormonal receptor status of breast cancer.

Methods

Subjects

The University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board approved our measurement protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject for the diffuse optical measurements and for publishing the data. For this retrospective study, written informed consent was not required for retrieval of specimens routinely stored in the tissue bank. From 37 subjects with cancer analyzed with DOT in our previous publications [6, 16], corresponding pathology slides for 21 subjects were available for additional staining of Ki67 and CD34. Specimens from the remaining subjects were not stored in the tissue bank from which we retrieved the tissues. Although some samples were not available for additional staining, information on 11 of these subjects was acquired from standard-of-care pathology reports for the correlation study with tumor grade and hormonal/genetic subtypes. Thus, a total 32 subjects with infiltrating ductal carcinoma were studied in this paper.

In the 21 subjects used for Ki67, CD34 and nuclear morphology analysis, DOT measurements were performed at three different times: (1) prior to any biopsy in 9 subjects (DOT measurements were made 5 days before the biopsy on average, i.e., 43 % of the sample); (2) prior to core biopsy in 2 subjects (DOT measurements were made 8 days prior to excision of the entire tumor on average, i.e., 9 %), and (3) ≥2 weeks after the biopsy and prior to excision of the entire tumor in 10 subjects (DOT measurements were made 18 days prior to excision of the entire tumor on average, i.e., 48 %).

For the full sample of 32 subjects, DOT measurements were performed (1) prior to any biopsy in 11 subjects (DOT measurements were made 5 days before the biopsy on average, 34 %); (2) prior to core biopsy in 6 subjects (DOT measurements were made 18 days prior to excision of the entire tumor, 19 %), and (3) ≥2 weeks after the biopsy and prior to excision of the entire tumor in 15 subjects (DOT measurements were made 22 days prior to excision of the entire tumor on average, 47 %). We did not observe any biopsy-induced bruises (black or blue) in any subjects, i.e., the patients' biopsy sites healed sufficiently that no visible signs were apparent. In addition, by comparing optical data obtained before versus after biopsy, Choe et al. [6] explicitly tested whether such biopsies affect tumor optical contrast, and no significant differences were found in that investigation. Therefore, we expect that the DOT patient measurements in the present work were not influenced by the biopsies. Different numbers of subjects were studied for each biomarker for various reasons, as described below (also see Additional file 1: Table S1).

Ki67

Samples from 18 out of the 21 subjects initially chosen for Ki67 evaluation were used; two slides lacked sufficient cancer tissue and one slide had uneven thickness (which caused out-of-focus microscopic imaging for this computer-assisted analysis). For the calculation of the tumor-to-normal ratio of Ki67 (rKi67), we only used samples from subjects with Ki67 expression in normal tissues, which corresponded to 9 out of the 18 subjects. These 9 cases were found to be pre-menopausal patients. All 18 subjects were used for the cancer-only analysis; Ki67 expression in confirmed cancer tissues from all patients was available for this analysis. (Note, this number is the numerator of the tumor-to-normal ratio (rKi67) for the patients who had both tumor and normal tissue Ki67 expression.) Samples were available for six subjects only for the comparison study between rMMRO2 (see Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS)) and relative mammary metabolic rate of oxygen (rMMRO2)) and Ki67 expression level, because blood flow data are required to calculate rMMRO2, and blood flow was measured by diffuse correlation spectroscopy in only six of the subjects included in this retrospective analysis. Among the six subjects, five had low Ki67 values and belonged to the Ki67-negative group; samples from these subjects were investigated for correlation with rMMRO2. Of these six, only two subjects had Ki67 expression in normal tissues and were therefore available for rMMRO2 versus rKi67 analysis.

CD34

Only the vascular structures of cancer tissues were available for study, because normal vessels were rarely observed adjacent to the biopsied cancer tissues. Generally, normal vessels appear far outside of the entire tumor structure, and therefore normal vessels were seldom observed in the small specimens. Of the 21 subjects, 19 were available for this analysis, because one specimen slide had uneven thickness and did not have sufficient cancer tissue for analysis.

Nuclear compactness

Samples from all 21 subjects were available for the nuclear compactness analysis.

Other analyses

In addition to the 21 subjects described above, we analyzed samples from an additional 11 subjects for whom DOT images and clinical pathology reports were available. Unfortunately, there were no tissue samples from these subjects for the additional staining described above. These additional subjects were included in some of our analyses to investigate the relationship between DOT physiological parameters, hormonal and genetic features, and breast cancer tumor grade. Among the total of 32 subjects, modified Bloom-Richardson scores were available for 29 subjects, and cancer hormonal status was reported for 31 subjects.

Diffuse optical tomography (DOT)

Details of the DOT system, measurement procedure and reconstruction algorithm are described in Choe et al. [6]. Briefly, the instrument employed the parallel-plate geometry for source and detector planes; a breast box was utilized wherein breasts were positioned while the subject was lying in a prone position. The breasts were compressed mildly to hold them in a stable position. An outline of the breast surface was obtained by a 16-bit charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera. An Intralipid/ink (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) solution with optical properties similar to breast tissue filled the box to form a background diffuse medium and thereby reduce dynamic-range requirements. Four lasers at 690, 750, 786 and 830 nm were modulated at 70 MHz, and two lasers at 650 and 905 nm were used in continuous-wave (CW) mode. Laser light was delivered to 45 source locations using optical switches shown as red dots in Fig. 1. The source plane also had nine fibers embedded within it (yellow dots in Fig. 1) for detection of modulated light in the remission geometry. These frequency-domain (FD) measurements provided bulk optical properties that served as initial guesses for further reconstruction. CW-domain transmission measurements were made through a transparent window utilizing the CCD camera. The 45 source locations and the CCD camera enabled collection of a very large dataset for reconstruction of 3-D optical images. The diffuse optical data for the images were acquired in 8–12 minutes. Following the subject measurement, a phantom calibration measurement was performed after fully filling the breast box with the same Intralipid/ink solution and covering the top of the box with a silicone slab to mimic the chest wall. A brief description on the reconstruction steps for generating 3-D optical images is included in Additional file 1. Three-dimensional images of oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin concentrations, tissue oxygenation and reduced-scattering coefficients were obtained.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Instrumental setup for the diffuse optical tomography (DOT) system, and DOT images acquired from a 53-year-old woman with a 2.2-cm (longest dimension) invasive ductal carcinoma. Bottom left depicts a three-dimensional tumor region (red). The images of rHb, rHbO 2 and rStO 2 are for relative (i.e., tumor-to-normal ratio) deoxyhemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin concentration and tissue oxygenation, respectively. Black solid line in the images indicates the region identified as tumor. FD frequency domain, CCD charge-coupled-device camera

Full size image

Determination of tumor boundaries in the optical images has previously been described [6]. Briefly, an approximate location for the tumor was first selected based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), x-ray mammography and ultrasound images. In the selected area, the location of the maximum intensity of the optical attenuation coefficient at 786 nm was found (tumors have higher optical attenuation coefficients than normal tissues), and thereafter, a 3-D region was grown using the maximum intensity location as a seed with a cutoff at full-width at half-maximum. During this process, we examined the selected tumor region to determine whether the optical images provided tumor location and size consistent with the radiological imaging methods. Tumor values for each optically derived parameter are extracted by averaging each parameter over this entire tumor volume. Normal tissue values are derived by averaging overall normal tissues (i.e., excluding the tumor) in the same breast. The tumor-to-normal ratio of each parameter was thus calculated; the letter ‘r’ is added in front of the abbreviation of each parameter to indicate a relative (tumor-to-normal) value, for example, relative tissue oxygen saturation (rStO2), relative total hemoglobin (rTHC), relative oxyhemoglobin (rHbO2), relative deoxyhemoglobin (rHb) concentrations, and relative reduced-scattering coefficients (rμs').

Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) and relative mammary metabolic rate of oxygen (rMMRO2)

DCS was used to measure a blood flow index that, in turn, was used to calculate a tumor-to-normal ratio of mammary metabolic rate of oxygen of a subset of subjects (n = 6) who also had Ki67 analysis. The DCS measurements were performed on the same day as the DOT measurements. Details about the DCS instrument, the mathematical model and the input parameters have been described by Choe et al. [16]. Briefly, DCS measures a temporal intensity autocorrelation function of the detected light, and the decay rate of the autocorrelation function indicates blood flow, for example, faster decays correlate with faster blood flow. A tissue blood flow index, BFI, was derived from the measured DCS temporal light intensity autocorrelation functions by fitting the data to a solution of the correlation diffusion equation in the homogeneous semi-infinite geometry [1]. The DCS system employed a 786-nm-long coherence laser as a light source (delivered through a multi-mode fiber), a single-mode fiber was used to collect light and a fast-photon-counting avalanche photodiode was used for detection. A custom-built correlator board determined the normalized temporal intensity autocorrelation functions of the detected light.

For in vivo measurements, the tumor location in a supine position was identified either by palpation or by consulting radiology reports. Then a handheld probe with one source and one detector fiber 2.5 cm apart was gently placed on the breast tissue and data were collected from 10–12 points (1 cm apart) aligned on a line straddling the tumor center. The tumor and normal tissue points were averaged, respectively, to obtain one representative tumor and one normal region blood flow index for each subject. The relative blood flow (rBF) was calculated by taking the ratio between tumor and normal region BFI values.

Part of the analysis of this paper employed a mammary oxygen metabolism model that was introduced by Zhou et al. [13]. The tumor-to-normal ratio of the (relative) mammary metabolic rate of oxygen (rMMRO2) employed herein was slightly modified from the version introduced by Zhou et al. to monitor metabolic changes in breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. rMMRO2 is expressed as follows:

$$ rMMR{O}_2=\frac{\gamma_N}{\gamma_T}\cdot \frac{rHb}{rTHC}\cdot rBF $$

where γ represents the percentage of blood volume contained in the venous component of the vascular system (i.e., StO2 = (1− γ)SaO2 + γ SvO2 where SaO2 and SvO2 are arterial and venous oxygen saturation, respectively [45]), the subscript T indicates tumor and N indicates normal tissue, and rBF is the tumor-to-normal ratio of BFI quantified by DCS [16]. Note, the so-defined rMMRO2 is closely related to the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen extraction (CMRO2) parameter that has been studied extensively for metabolism measurements in the brain [1, 46–49].

Microscopic analysis of tissue specimens

Slide selection and immunohistochemical analysis

Tissue blocks that include cancer tissues were reviewed, and blocks with the most cancer tissue were selected by a pathologist (MDF) for microscopic analysis of cancer properties. Immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was performed using antibodies against Ki67 (Clone MIB-1; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA M7240; 1:20 dilution) and CD34 (Clone My10; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA 347660; 1:80 dilution) on separate slides from the selected tissue block. Staining was done on a Leica Bondâ„¢ instrument using the Bond Polymer Refine Detection System (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL AR9800). Heat-induced epitope retrieval was required for Ki67 and this was performed for 20 minutes with ER1 solution (Leica Microsystems AR9961).

Digital analysis of the staining

The stained slides were scanned using Aperio ScanScope (Aperio, Vista, CA, USA) with ×20 objective. In order to account for cancer heterogeneity, multiple regions of interest (ROI) were selected in the cancer and normal tissue samples (i.e., 2–7 ROI depending on the available amount of tissue and degree of heterogeneity) by SHC under the guidance of MDF and DM using the annotation tool of Aperio ImageScope, and MDF re-confirmed the selected ROI tissue types. We noticed that a few extremely dark spots appeared randomly on the slides, mostly clusters of the staining dye. These spots cause errors in the analysis, because the algorithm selects pixels with lower intensity than a threshold value as positive nuclei, and the dark spots have extremely low intensity values that can result in mistaken selection as strongly positive nuclei; thus, those areas were excluded manually using the annotation tool. An area-weighted average of the multiple ROI for each subject was used in the correlation study. The Ki67 and CD34 stained areas were differentiated from the non-stained areas by setting relative values of red-green-blue (RGB) optical densities (for defining the color of the stain) and the intensity of the defined color. These values were optimized by iterative adjustments: the detection algorithm with the set values was applied to multiple sample cases and the results were visually examined by MDF if the assigned color on the nuclei matched the actual features of the nuclei (Fig. 2). For Ki67 detection, the Ki67-expressing nuclei percent of the total number of nuclei in an ROI was calculated using the Aperio immunohistochemistry (IHC) nuclear image analysis algorithm (version 10.2). We counted 3278 nuclei per subject (on average) with a range of 270 to 4114 in the 15 subjects (Fig. 2a, b). Then, the tumor-to-normal ratio of Ki67-expressing nuclei was calculated to derive relative Ki67 values (i.e., rKi67). For this analysis, after subjects were selected and slides obtained, only normal glandular tissues with Ki67 expression (within each slide) were used.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Ki67-expresseing nuclei were stained by MIB-1 and appear as brown spots. Abnormal extreme dark spots caused errors in automated analyses and were excluded manually (see blue loops). b Dark blue regions designate cells in which the nuclei did not express Ki67, and yellow and orange regions designate cells with Ki67-expressing nuclei (note, orange signifies more intense expression). c CD34-stained vessels appear brown. d Detected vessels were highlighted in neon green using the Aperio algorithm. e The raw image was segmented into cancer (pink) versus non-cancerous (green) areas as shown in f. g Individual cells were detected as neon green loops. Based on nuclear shape, the compactness of the nuclei was calculated using inForm 1.0.2 (Perkin Elmer)

Full size image

For CD34-stained vessel properties, the Aperio microvessel analysis algorithm was used. An average of 118 vessels per ROI were detected (n = 19) and used for the quantification of micro-vessel density (number of vessels per unit area (μm2)), mean vessel and vascular area and the ratio of stained area to ROI area. Note, the mean vessel area includes the lumen in addition to the endothelial cells that form the vascular structure. To calculate the mean vessel/vascular area for each ROI, only vessels with a closed cross-section were automatically detected in the ROI first, then a mean value of the vessel/vascular area was calculated for each ROI (Fig. 2c, d).

For the nuclei morphology analysis, binary segmentation (cancer versus non-cancer) was used instead of the ROI selection. The digitized slides were converted to a multispectral data stack using Nuance 2.10.0 (Perkin Elmer). Then, using inForm 1.0.2 image analysis software (Perkin Elmer), tumor and normal tissues were segmented by the training algorithm, and the nuclear shapes were detected and used for the calculation of the nuclear compactness (Fig. 2e, f, g). Nuclear compactness is calculated using the following equation:

$$ \mathrm{Compactness}=4\pi \times \mathrm{Area}/{\mathrm{Perimeter}}^2. $$

Statistical analysis

We used Pearson’s correlation coefficient (corr. coef.) to assess the linear association between the mean of the DOT physiological parameters and the microscopically assessed histopathological biomarkers. We generally report on possible linear relationships between the DOT physiological parameters and several biomarkers. We also used Spearman’s correlation coefficient to further explore the possibility of a monotonic, but non-linear relationship. The Wilcoxon ranked sum test was used to ascertain differences in DOT parameters in Ki67-positive and Ki67-negative groups (those defined by the 15 % cutoff threshold). The type I error rate was 0.05, and corrections were not made for multiple comparisons in this exploratory study.

Results

Association of DOT parameters with Ki67 cancer proliferation

The percent range of the Ki67-nuclei used for determination of tumor-to-normal ratio of Ki67 (i.e., rKi67) varied from 0.05−23.45 % in cancer tissues (n = 9), and from 0.19−7.41 % in normal tissues (n = 9) (see Additional file 1: Table S2). More subjects were included for the DOT versus cancer-only Ki67-expression comparison study, and the Ki67 range for this latter investigation was 0.05−27.77 % in cancer tissues (n = 18). Among the DOT parameters, rStO2 and rHbO2 were linearly correlated with rKi67 as shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1 (Pearson correlation of 0.89, p-value 0.001 for rStO2, and Pearson correlation of 0.68, p-value 0.044 for rHbO2). Also, for cancer-only Ki67, rHb was inversely correlated with cancer Ki67 percent (Spearman correlation of −0.62, p-value 0.007; see Additional file 1: Table S3 for all correlation values between DOT physiological parameters and cancer Ki67 percent). The range of Ki67 values and those of other molecular biomarkers used in the remainder of the correlation studies are tabulated in Additional file 1: Table S4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between a relative tissue oxygen saturation (rStO2) and rKi67 and b relative oxyhemoglobin concentration (rHbO2) and rKi67 (n = 9). Dotted lines indicate 95 % confidence interval for the mean of the linear fit. These pilot results suggest that more oxygen is present in the more proliferative cancer tissues

Full size image
Table 1 Correlation between rKi67 and various relative DOT parameters
Full size table

Clinically, Ki67 expression is used as a biomarker for cancer proliferation. Tissue is termed Ki67-positive (or Ki67-negative) if the fraction of nuclei expressing Ki67 is above (or below) a specified cutoff, which is commonly set at 15 % [50–53]. In the present study, we tested whether DOT and DCS parameters are significantly different in more proliferative cancers compared to less proliferative cancers (i.e., as determined by the 15 % Ki67 cutoff). In this scenario, only rHb was found to differentiate Ki67-positive from Ki67-negative cancer, with lower values of rHb occurring for Ki67-positive cancer (p-value 0.01, Wilcoxon ranked sum test, Fig. 4a; see Additional file 1: Table S5 for values of all DOT physiological parameters of Ki67-positive and Ki67-negative cancer groups). Among the available subjects, 15 were Ki67-negative and 3 were Ki67-positive, but a p-value of 0.01 suggests the pilot result may be significant, even with the limited sample size.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Relative deoxyhemoglobin concentration (rHb) versus Ki67 expression in breast cancer tissues. Lower rHb is observed in Ki67-positive cancer compared to Ki67-negative cancer (p-value 0.01, n = 3 for Ki67-positive and n = 15 for Ki67-negative cancer). Squares and circles in the box plots show the values for each individual subject. On each box, the central bar is the median, the edges of the box mark the 25th and 75th percentiles and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points not considered outliers. b Correlation between mammary metabolic rate of oxygen (rMMR2) and Ki67 in cancer for a subset of the Ki67-negative group (n = 5), for whom diffuse correlation spectroscopy flow measurements were available. Dotted lines indicate the 95 % confidence interval of the mean of the linear fit

Full size image

In the comparison between rMMRO2 and Ki67 expression level, not all the subjects were measured with DCS: six subjects were available for analysis of the relationship between rMMRO2 and cancer-Ki67, and two subjects for analysis of the relationship between rMMRO2 and rKi67. Among the six subjects, five had low Ki67 values and belonged to the Ki67-negative group; the Ki67 percentage in these subjects exhibited significant inverse linear correlation with rMMRO2 (Pearson correlation −0.95, p-value 0.014, Fig. 4b). One subject belonged to the Ki67-positive group and did not follow the linear trend observed for the Ki67-negative group in Fig. 4b (the Ki67-positive subject is not shown). On analysis of the two subjects in whom rKi67 was compared to rMMRO2, higher rKi67 was associated with lower rMMRO2.

In addition, we ran predictability tests using the >15 % threshold to define Ki67-positive cancer. In this case, we found high negative predictive values (i.e., 100 %) for detection of non-proliferative cancer with specific thresholds for each of the DOT parameters. For example, if values of rHb <1.1 are considered proliferative, then 100 % of the negative predicted values are truly negative. However, given the small dataset (n = 18), the implications of this predictability result should not be overestimated. The main caveat is that only three subjects were in the Ki67-positive group (15 subjects were in the Ki67-negative group). Thus, it is difficult to ascertain the heterogeneity of the Ki67-positive group. Albeit imperfect, the strong correlation and predictability obtained from our DOT data suggest that DOT holds potential to predict proliferative status of breast cancer non-invasively and that the method is deserving of further exploration. This result can also aid the planning of a future study that will require more Ki67-positive samples.

Association between DOT parameters and CD34 stained vascular properties

Blood vessels in cancer tissues were detected and analyzed using the CD34 antibody. Among all the vascular properties accessible to this staining, i.e., micro-vessel density, mean vessel/vascular area, and ratio of stained area to analysis area, only mean vessel area (MVA) was significantly and linearly correlated with rTHC and rHbO2 (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.51, p-value 0.027 and Pearson correlation of 0.48, p-value 0.038, respectively; see Fig. 5, Table 2). However, it should be noted that rTHC, rHbO2 and rμs' had higher ranked monotonic correlation with MVA (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.67, p-value 0.002; Spearman correlation of 0.63, p-value 0.005; and Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.52, p-value 0.024, respectively).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Correlation between a relative total hemoglobin concentration (rTHC) and b relative oxyhemoglobin concentration (rHbO2) versus mean vessel area (MVA, μm2) (n = 19). Dotted lines indicate the 95 % confidence interval of the mean of the linear fit. These pilot results suggest that diffuse optical tomography is measuring an increased blood supply in the larger-diameter blood vessels of these cancer tissues

Full size image
Table 2 Correlation between CD34-stained mean vessel areas (MVA) and DOT parameters
Full size table

Association of DOT parameter with nuclear morphological analysis

On nuclear morphology analysis there was weak positive correlation between rHbO2 and the tumor-to-normal ratio of nuclear compactness (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.43, p-value 0.049, n = 21; see Additional file 1: Table S6 for values for correlation between all DOT physiological parameters and relative nuclear compactness.). Additionally, rStO2 was weakly positively correlated with cancer nuclear compactness (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.47, p-value 0.034; see Additional file 1: Table S7 for values for correlation between all DOT physiological parameters and relative nuclear compactness.). When the nucleus is spherical, then the compactness is unity. In our case, all of the measured compactness values were smaller than unity.

As the tumor grade worsened (i.e., became higher), although a slight trend of increasing rStO2 and decreasing rHb was observed, it was not statistically significant (n = 29). Lastly, distinct differentiation of DOT parameters was not observed in any of the estrogen receptor (ER)-, progesterone receptor (PR)- and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2)-positive versus -negative groups (n = 31).

Differences between breast cancer subtypes

All but one of the samples used for the rKi67 correlation analysis were luminal A subtype; the other sample was basal-like and its rKi67 value was the median. For Ki67 (not rKi67) in cancer tissues, within the luminal A subtype (n = 12), negative correlation was observed between Ki67 percent and rHb (Spearman correlation of −0.57) with a trend towards statistical significance (p-value 0.059). No trend was observed within the basal-like subtype (n = 4). Correlation was not analyzed separately in two subjects with HER2-positive cancer due to small sample size.

In the CD34 comparison studies, within the basal-like subtype group (n = 4), the Pearson correlation coefficient between MVA and rTHC was 0.96 (p-value 0.045). Within the luminal A group (n = 12), several statistically significant correlations were observed between MVA and rTHC (Spearman correlation of 0.69, p-value 0.016), rHbO2 (Spearman correlation of 0.71, p-value 0.012) and rμs’ (Spearman correlation of 0.62, p-value 0.035). Two subjects with HER2-positive and one with the luminal B subtype were not included in the subtype correlation analysis.

In the nuclear compactness comparison study, within subjects with the basal-like subtype (n = 5), there was evidence of positive correlation between rμs' and the nuclear compactness of cancer cells (Pearson correlation of 0.87) with a trend towards statistical significance (p-value 0.057). No correlation was observed within the luminal A subtypes (n = 13). Two subjects with HER2-positive cancer and one with the luminal B subtype were not included in the subtype correlation analysis.

In addition, among the group that included subjects only with DOT images and subtype information (no tissue slides, n = 32), we found that basal-like (n = 6) and HER2-positive (n = 3) subtypes were significantly differentiated (p-value 0.023) by rTHC values, although the sample size was very small.

Discussion

Our study revealed that the tumor-to-normal (relative) ratio of Ki67-positive nuclei is correlated positively with rStO2 measured by DOT. This observation suggests that the more proliferative cells reside in more oxygenated environments, i.e., more oxygenated compared to surrounding normal tissues. Further, the percentage of Ki67 nuclei in cancer-only tissues was inversely correlated with DOT-measured rHb, and in a subset of subjects with low Ki67 expression, an inverse correlation between Ki67 expression level and rMMRO2 [13] was observed (R = −0.95, p-value 0.014). We found that MVA correlated positively with DOT-measured relative total hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin concentration; this observation suggests that an increased blood supply to the tumors is due to increased blood vessel size rather than blood vessel density. The combination of these pilot results suggests that more proliferative cancer cells demand less oxygen. Finally, we observed that in less oxygenated environments, cell nuclei tend to exhibit a more elongated shape. Overall, the results of the pilot study corroborate expectations that macroscopic measurements of breast cancer physiology using DOT can reveal information about the microscopic pathological properties of breast cancer and hold potential to complement pathological biomarker information.

The Ki67 proliferation biomarker was chosen because it is one of the biomarkers of choice for determination of cancer severity [32, 54]. Baseline measurements of Ki67 have correctly predicted patient prognosis [32, 55, 56], and high levels of Ki67 predict better responses to chemotherapy [31, 57, 58]. The percentage ranges of the Ki67-nuclei of our tissue samples are consistent with reported values in the literature, including those obtained from automated evaluation methods [59, 60]. Specifically, in two studies, more than 72 % of 379 patients [59] and 50 % [61] of 3658 patients had cancer with <15 % Ki67 expression, and in a study by Konsti et al., the mean Ki67 expression level in 1334 subjects was 8.8 % [60]. By contrast, Ki67 expression level in normal breast tissues was found to be less than 3 % in several studies [32, 62–64]. We observed that rKi67 correlated positively with rStO2 and rHbO2. Our finding of correlation between rStO2 and rKi67 is supported by the observations of Ueda et al. [30] who measured higher tissue oxygenation in subjects with complete pathological response (i.e., compared to those with incomplete pathological response) prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In our study, patients with higher levels of tissue oxygenation exhibited a high level of Ki67, and the combination of all reports supports the well-known finding that a high Ki67 level predicts better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [31, 57, 58]. Ki67 is known to be correlated with apoptosis [32, 65, 66]. One of our previous works showed simultaneous increase of tissue oxygenation and temperature caused by an uncoupled apoptotic state at the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a subject who was found to have complete pathological response [19]. The strong correlation between Ki67 and tissue oxygenation found in this current work combined with the previous result supports the correlation between Ki67 and apoptosis in breast cancer.

We also found that rHb was inversely correlated with cancer-only Ki67, and that rHb was lower in Ki67-positive cancer compared to Ki67-negative cancer (using the 15 % cutoff, note this cutoff can vary from 10−20 % in different clinics). It is noteworthy that in the tumors with rHb smaller than unity (i.e., less deoxyhemoglobin in the tumor than surrounding normal tissues), the rStO2 was larger than unity (higher tissue oxygenation in the tumor compared to normal tissues): this finding suggests that in more proliferative tumors, oxygenated blood is supplied to the tumor but the excess oxygen is not fully used.

Importantly, we took an additional step to further investigate the relationship between proliferation and oxygen metabolism. Specifically, we calculated the tumor-to-normal rMMRO2 in a subset of the data; only a small number of subjects among the population were studied in this retrospective analysis because only a small number were measured with DCS, which provides the relative blood flow (rBF) data needed to calculate rMMRO2. In the tumors with very low Ki67 expression, there was inverse correlation between oxygen metabolism and Ki67 level. In total, the full set of Ki67/DOT-parameter comparison studies suggest that higher tissue oxygenation tends to arise in cancers with higher expression of Ki67, lower deoxyhemoglobin concentration is often present in more proliferative cancers, and tumors with rHb <1 have rStO2 >1. Although more blood is supplied to the cancer compared to normal tissue (i.e., all subjects had rTHC >1), the level of oxygenated hemoglobin in the tumor remains high, and less oxygen is utilized for cancer metabolism (yielding a lower tumor rHb).

These preliminary conclusions about the relationship between proliferation and oxygen metabolism in breast cancer can be explained by the Warburg effect [44], which accounts for the fact that some cancer cells go through glycolysis to increase biomass without using oxygen, despite sufficient oxygen in the tissue environment [67, 68]. While these findings are interesting, we note that our model for rMMRO2 has several simplifying assumptions about the vasculature and tissue heterogeneity [1], and the DCS and DOT measurements utilized different measurement geometries. In the future, it would be interesting to include measurement of Myc, a glycolysis marker, which would enable further exploration of the relationship between cancer metabolism and proliferation [69].

Finally, we note that in the rKi67/DOT correlation study, all of the samples with Ki67 expression in normal tissues were obtained from premenopausal patients. Therefore, it is possible that the premenopausal status of all subjects used for the rKi67/DOT correlation could have contributed to the correlations observed. Greater proliferation in normal or benign tissues has been observed in premenopausal women [70]. Ultimately, when more tissues become available, we will be able to ascertain the importance of menopausal status.

CD34-stained vascular properties were also compared to DOT parameters. CD34 is expressed in the endothelial cells of micro-vessels that migrate during angiogenesis [33, 71, 72], and CD34 was used to assess vascularity in the tumor samples. In the samples studied, only tumor areas were studied so that only tumor vascularity was assessed. Distant normal tissue was not available for investigation of the patient biopsies. We chose CD34 instead of CD31, because a prior investigation [72] compared various monoclonal antibodies for angiogenesis assessment and found that the antibody to CD34 was more reliable than the CD31 antibody. Among compared vascular parameters, MVA in cancer tissues was correlated with rTHC, rHbO2 and rμs'. These results met our expectation that DOT measures increased blood supply to cancer through the abnormally dilated blood vessels in cancer tissues [73].

The DOT tumor-to-normal tissue parameters have previously been shown by Choe and co-workers [6] to exhibit excellent differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. However, the association between DOT parameters and tumor pathology was not explored. Here, the use of tumor-to-normal ratios for both optical and histological data minimized the effects of inter-subject absolute property variation. Optical measurement of total hemoglobin concentration has been compared with histologically evaluated vascular properties in other studies. In a study by Srinivasan et al. using near-infrared tomography, a correlation value of 0.3 was obtained (p-value not reported) for association between total hemoglobin concentration and the vessel density in 12 subjects, including both benign and malignant tumors [38]. Zhu et al. measured total hemoglobin concentration using a combined system of ultrasound and near infrared optical imaging, observing correlation between total hemoglobin concentration and micro-vessel density (MVD, R = 0.64, p-value <0.05, 10 samples from 6 subjects) [39]. In a study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy responders, Pakalniskis and colleagues observed significant correlation between CD105-stained MVD and total hemoglobin concentration in subjects with complete pathological response, but not in those with partial pathological response (p <0.001, n = 7, correlation coefficient not reported) [37]. In our study, vessel area was more strongly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.67, p-value 0.002, n = 19) with total hemoglobin concentration than the MVD, which was not significantly correlated with total hemoglobin concentration. We note that generally the various studies reported in the literature differ in the antibodies employed, the analysis methods utilized (automatic vessel detection versus manual hotspot counting), and, in some cases, in the way parameters are defined. For example, in our work, MVD was defined as the number of vessels per unit area (μm2), but in the work of Pakalniskis et al., MVD is defined as a percentage of the combined areas of CD105-stained vessels per total area of the slide.

Nuclear morphology has been shown to exhibit a more elongated shape in cancer cells than normal cells [34–36]. Hajihashemi et al. observed higher μs' and more elongation in cancer nuclei than the normal or benign tissues [34, 35]. In our study, the tumor-to-normal ratio of nuclear compactness was smaller than 1, which indicates that the tumor had more elongated nuclei than the normal tissues. The relative and cancer nuclear compactness was only weakly correlated with rHbO2 and rStO2, respectively, suggesting that in a less oxygenated environment, the nuclei tend to be more elongated.

Looking forward, tissue samples from normal breast tissue need to be collected. The correlation between rTHC and the CD34-stained MVA could be augmented and improved, for example, if normal vessels were available. Although our statistical power to detect clinically relevant associations is limited by the number of samples available for analysis, the cohort we have investigated has yielded some potentially important findings. Further studies will be needed to confirm the results reported here. In future studies, tissues sent out for the trial, the Investigation of Serial studies to Predict Your therapeutic response with imaging and molecular analysis (I-SPY, American College of Radiology and Imaging Network Protocol 6657), will be also included. Finally, it is noteworthy that inclusion of multiple ROI in each specimen produced stronger correlation by partially accounting for cancer heterogeneity.

Conclusion

This pilot study has shown that DOT-measured and DCS-measured breast cancer physiological parameters are correlated with proliferation of cancer cells and with formation of abnormally dilated blood vessels in cancer. The results suggest that DOT may be useful as a non-invasive assessment tool for specific cancer biomarkers, especially for cancer proliferation. As Ki67 is a well-known prognostic index and an early predictor of tumor response to chemotherapy, the high correlation between Ki67 and DOT-measured tissue oxygenation further suggests the potential of optical imaging and monitoring. The optical methods utilize non-ionizing radiation and can be easily employed at the bedside. These features, coupled with predictive capability, are particularly attractive for patients who need frequent monitoring, for example, during chemotherapy, and for women with radiographically dense breast tissue.

Abbreviations

3-D:

three-dimensional

AD:

Angela DeMichele

AGY:

Arjun G. Yodh

BFI:

tissue blood flow index

BJC:

Brian Czerniekcki

CCD:

charge-coupled-device

CMRO2 :

cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen extraction

corr. coef.:

correlation coefficient

CW:

continuous-wave

DCS:

diffuse correlation spectroscopy

DM:

Daniel Marinez

DOT:

diffuse optical tomography

DRB:

David R. Busch

ER:

estrogen receptor

FD:

frequency-domain

FDG:

fluorodeoxyglucose

HER2:

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

HK:

Helen Kim

IHC:

immunohistochemical analysis

I-SPY:

Investigation of serial studies to predict your therapeutic response with imaging and molecular analysis

JT:

Julia Tchou

MAR:

Mark A. Rosen

MDF:

Michael D. Feldman

MDS:

Mitchell D. Schnall

MEP:

Mary E. Putt

MVA:

mean vessel area

MVD:

mean vessel density

NAC:

neoadjuvant chemotherapy

NHLBI:

National Heart Lung and Blood Institute

NIH:

National Institute of Health

PR:

progesterone receptor

rBF:

relative blood flow

RC:

Regine Choe

RGB:

red-green-blue

rHb:

relative deoxyhemoglobin concentration

rHbO2 :

relative oxyhemoglobin concentration

rKi67:

tumor-to-normal ratio of Ki67, or relative Ki67

rMMRO2 :

tumor-to-normal ratio of mammary metabolic rate of oxygen, or relative mammary metabolic rate of oxygen

ROI:

region(s) of interest

rStO2 :

relative tissue oxygen saturation

rTHC:

relative total hemoglobin concentration

rμs’:

relative reduced-scattering coefficients

SaO2 :

arterial oxygen saturation

SHC:

So Hyun Chung

StO2 :

tissue oxygen saturation

SvO2 :

venous oxygen saturation

References

  1. Durduran T, Choe R, Baker WB, Yodh AG. Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography. Rep Prog Phys. 2010;73:1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leff DR, Warren OJ, Enfield LC, Gibson A, Athanasiou T, Patten DK, et al. Diffuse optical imaging of the healthy and diseased breast: A systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108:9–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tromberg BJ, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD, Yodh AG, Boas DA, Cerussi AE. Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. Med Phys. 2008;35:2443–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Carp SA, Selb J, Fang Q, Moore R, Kopans DB, Rafferty E, et al. Dynamic functional and mechanical response of breast tissue to compression. Opt Express. 2008;16:16064–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerussi AE, Shah N, Hsiang D, Durkin A, Butler J, Tromberg BJ. In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2006;11:044005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choe R, Konecky SD, Corlu A, Lee K, Durduran T, Busch DR, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by in-vivo three-dimensional parallel-plate diffuse optical tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:024020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung SH, Cerussi AE, Klifa C, Baek HM, Birgul O, Gulsen G, et al. In vivo water state measurements in breast cancer using broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:6713–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pogue BW, Jiang S, Dehghani H, Kogel C, Soho S, Srinivasan S, et al. Characterization of hemoglobin, water, and NIR scattering in breast tissue: Analysis of intersubject variability and menstrual cycle changes. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:541–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerussi A, Hsiang D, Shah N, Mehta R, Durkin A, Butler J, et al. Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:4014–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung SH, Cerussi A, Mehta R, Hsiang D, Tromberg B. Non-invasive detection and monitoring of tumor pathological grade during neoadjuvant chemotherapy by measuring tissue water state using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging. Cancer Res. 2009;69:101S.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Soliman H, Gunasekara A, Rycroft M, Zubovits J, Dent R, Spayne J, et al. Functional imaging using diffuse optical spectroscopy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in women with locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2605–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tromberg BJ, Cerussi AE. Imaging Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Responses with Light, Commentary on Soliman et al., p. 2605. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2486–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou C, Choe R, Shah N, Durduran T, Yu G, Durkin A, et al. Diffuse optical monitoring of blood flow and oxygenation in human breast cancer during early stages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Biomed Opt. 2007;12:051903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu Q, Tannenbaum S, Hegde P, Kane M, Xu C, Kurtzman S. Noninvasive monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using optical tomography with ultrasound localization. Neoplasia. 2008;10:1028–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tromberg BJ, Cerussi AE, Chung SH, Tanamai W, Durkin A. Broadband Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging. In: Boas DA, Pitris C, Ramanujam N, editors. Handbook of Biomedical Optics. Florida, USA: CRC Press, Boca Raton; 2011. p. 181–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Choe R, Putt ME, Carlile PM, Durduran T, Giammarco JM, Busch DR, et al. Optically measured microvascular blood flow contrast of malignant breast tumors. Plos One. 2014;9.

  17. Chung SH, Cerussi AE, Hsiang D, Tromberg BJ. Non-invasive measurement of pathological heterogeneity of cancer tissues using water state information from diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging. Cancer Res. 2009;69:767S.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chung SH, Cerussi AE, Merritt SI, Ruth J, Tromberg BJ. Non-invasive tissue temperature measurements based on quantitative diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS) of water. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:3753–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung SH, Mehta R, Tromberg BJ, Yodh AG. Non-invasive measurement of deep tissue temperature changes caused by apoptosis during breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy: a case study. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2011;4:361–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Taroni P, Pifferi A, Salvagnini E, Spinelli L, Torricelli A, Cubeddu R. Seven-wavelength time-resolved optical mammography extending beyond 1000 nm for breast collagen quantification. Opt Express. 2009;17:15932–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taroni P, Comelli D, Pifferi A, Torricelli A, Cubeddu R. Absorption of collagen: effects on the estimate of breast composition and related diagnostic implications. J Biomed Opt. 2007;12:014021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kukreti S, Cerussi AE, Tanamai W, Hsiang D, Tromberg BJ, Gratton E. Characterization of metabolic differences between benign and malignant tumors: high-spectral-resolution diffuse optical spectroscopy. Radiology. 2010;254:277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ntziachristos V, Yodh AG, Schnall MD, Chance B. MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions. Neoplasia. 2002;4:347–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Q, Cronin EB, Currier AA, Vine HS, Huang MM, Chen NG, et al. Benign versus malignant breast masses: Optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction. Radiology. 2005;237:57–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Choe R, Corlu A, Lee K, Durduran T, Konecky SD, Grosicka-Koptyra M, et al. Diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A case study with comparison to MRI. Med Phys. 2005;32:1128–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Busch DR, Choe R, Rosen MA, Guo WS, Durduran T, Feldman MD, et al. Optical malignancy parameters for monitoring progression of breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4:105–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang SD, Pogue BW, Carpenter CM, Poplack SP, Wells WA, Kogel CA, et al. Evaluation of breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tomographic diffuse optical spectroscopy: case studies of tumor region-of-interest changes. Radiology. 2009;252:551–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Roblyer D, Ueda S, Cerussi A, Tanamai W, Durkin A, Mehta R, et al. Optical imaging of breast cancer oxyhemoglobin flare correlates with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response one day after starting treatment. PNAS. 2011;108:14626–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaafsma BE, van de Giessen M, Charehbili A, Smit VTHBM, Kroep JR, Lelieveldt BPF, et al. Optical mammography using diffuse optical spectroscopy for monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:577–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ueda S, Roblyer D, Cerussi A, Durkin A, Leproux A, Santoro Y, et al. Baseline tumor oxygen saturation correlates with a pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4318–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Faneyte IF, Schrama JG, Peterse JL, Remijnse PL, Rodenhuis S, van der Vijver MJ. Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:406–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Urruticoechea A, Smith IE, Dowsett M. Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7212–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heimann R, Ferguson D, Powers C, Recant WM, Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S. Angiogenesis as a predictor of long-term survival for patients with node-negative breast Cancer. J Natl Canc Inst. 1996;88:1764–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hajihashemi MR, Grobmyer SR, Al-Quran SZ, Jiang HB. Noninvasive Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry in Breast Lesions Using Multispectral Diffuse Optical Tomography. Plos One. 2012;7:e45714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li CQ, Grobmyer SR, Massol N, Liang XP, Zhang QZ, Chen L, et al. Noninvasive in vivo tomographic optical imaging of cellular morphology in the breast: Possible convergence of microscopic pathology and macroscopic radiology. Med Phys. 2008;35:2493–501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mourant JR, Johnson TM, Carpenter S, Guerra A, Aida T, Freyer JP. Polarized angular dependent spectroscopy of epithelial cells and epithelial cell nuclei to determine the size scale of scattering structures. J Biomed Opt. 2002;7:378–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pakalniskis MG, Wells WA, Schwab MC, Froehlich HM, Jiang SD, Li ZZ, et al. Tumor angiogenesis change estimated by using diffuse optical spectroscopic tomography: demonstrated correlation in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer? Radiology. 2011;259:365–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Srinivasan S, Pogue BW, Brooksby B, Jiang S, Dehghani H, Kogel C, et al. Near-infrared characterization of breast tumors in vivo using spectrally-constrained reconstruction. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005;4:513–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu QN, Kurtzman SH, Hegde P, Tannenbaum S, Kane M, Huang MM, et al. Utilizing optical tomography with ultrasound localization to image heterogeneous hemoglobin distribution in large breast cancers. Neoplasia. 2005;7:263–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Buck A, Schirrmeister H, Kuhn T, Shen CX, Kalker T, Kotzerke J, et al. FDG uptake in breast cancer: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1317–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cochet A, Pigeonnat S, Khoury B, Vrigneaud JM, Touzery C, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. Evaluation of breast tumor blood flow with dynamic first-pass F-18-FDG PET/CT: comparison with angiogenesis markers and prognostic factors. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:512–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tchou J, Sonnad SS, Bergey MR, Basu S, Tomaszewski J, Alavi A, et al. Degree of tumor FDG uptake correlates with proliferation index in triple negative breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:657–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheng JY, Lei L, Xu JY, Sun YF, Zhang YP, Wang XC, et al. F-18-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A potential tool for predicting primary endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Warburg O, Posener K, Negelein E. Ueber den Stoffwechsel der Tumoren. Biochem Z. 1924;152:319–44. German.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Culver JP, Durduran T, Furuya T, Cheung C, Greenberg JH, Yodh AG. Diffuse optical tomography of cerebral blood flow, oxygenation, and metabolism in rat during focal ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:911–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boas DA, Strangman G, Culver JP, Hoge RD, Jasdzewski G, Poldrack RA, et al. Can the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen be estimated with near-infrared spectroscopy? Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:2405–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Durduran T, Yu GQ, Burnett MG, Detre JA, Greenberg JH, Wang JJ, et al. Diffuse optical measurement of blood flow, blood oxygenation, and metabolism in a human brain during sensorimotor cortex activation. Opt Lett. 2004;29:1766–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Roche-Labarbe N, Surova A, Carp S, Patel M, Boas DA, Grant PE, et al. Non-invasive optical measures of Cbv, Sto2, Cbf Index, and Rcmro2 in premature brains during the first 6 weeks of life. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:48.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kastrup A, Kruger G, Neumann-Haefelin T, Glover GH, Moseley ME. Changes of cerebral blood flow, oxygenation, and oxidative metabolism during graded motor activation. Neuroimage. 2002;15:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Denkert C, Loibl S, Muller BM, Eidtmann H, Schmitt WD, Eiermann W, et al. Ki67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2786–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn H-J, et al. Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1319–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn H-J, et al. Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1736–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Guarneri V, Piacentini F, Ficarra G, Frassoldati A, D’Amico R, Giovannelli S, et al. A prognostic model based on nodal staus and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherpy. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1193–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: From the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:311–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Clahsen PC, van de Velde CJH, Duval C, Pallud C, Mandard AM, Delobelle-Deroide A, et al. The utility of mitotic index, oestrogen receptor and Ki-67 measurements in the creation of novel prognostic indices for node-negative breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:356–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Molino A, Micciolo R, Turazza M, Bonetti F, Piubello Q, Bonetti A, et al. Ki-67 immunostaining in 322 primary breast cancers: Associations with clinical and pathological variables and prognosis. Int J Cancer. 1997;74:433–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chang J, Ormerod M, Powles TJ, Allred DC, Ashley SE, Dowsett M. Apoptosis and proliferation as predictors of chemotherapy response in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:2145–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Petit T, Wilt M, Velten M, Millon R, Rodier JF, Borel C, et al. Comparative value of tumour grade, hormonal receptors, Ki-67, HER-2 and topoisomerase II alpha status as predictive markers in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mohammed ZMA, McMillan DC, Elsberger B, Going JJ, Orange C, Mallon E, et al. Comparison of Visual and automated assessment of Ki-67 proliferative activity and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:383–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Konsti J, Lundin M, Joensuu H, Lehtimaki T, Sihto H, Holli K, et al. Development and evaluation of a virtual microscopy application for automated assessment of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer. BMC Clin Pathol. 2011;11:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Inwald EC, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstadter F, Zeman F, Koller M, Gerstenhauer M, et al. Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:539–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Harper-Wynne C, Ross G, Sacks N, Salter J, Nasiri N, Iqbal J, et al. Effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on normal breast epithelial cell proliferation and metabolic indices in postmenopausal women: a pilot study for breast cancer prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:614–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Carke R, Howell A, Potten C, Anderson E. Dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in the human breast. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4987–91.

    Google Scholar 

  64. de Lima G, Facina G, Shida J, Chein M, Tanaka P, Dardes R, et al. Effects of low dose tamoxifen on normal breast tissue from premenopausal women. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:891–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Burcombe R, Wilson GD, Dowsett M, Khan I, Richman PI, Daley F, et al. Evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation and apoptotic index before, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Breast Canc Res. 2006;8:R31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lipponen P. Apoptosis in breast cancer: relationship with other pathological parameters. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 1999;6:13–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Heiden MGV, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lopez-Lazaro M. The Warburg effect: why and how do cancer cells activate glycolysis in the presence of oxygen? Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2008;8:305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dang CV. Rethinking the Warburg Effect with Myc micromanaging glutamine metabolism. Cancer Res. 2010;70:859–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Khan QJ, Kimler BF, O’Dea AP, Zalles CM, Sharma P, Fabian CJ. Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Canc Res. 2007;9:R35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Fina L, Molgaard HV, Robertson D, Bradley NJ, Monaghan P, Delia D, et al. Expression of the Cd34 Gene in Vascular Endothelial-Cells. Blood. 1990;75:2417–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Martin L, Green B, Renshaw C, Lowe D, Rudland P, Leinster SJ, et al. Examining the technique of angiogenesis assessment in invasive breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:1046–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH R01-CA75124, R01-EB002109, K99/R00-CA126187, P41-EB015893 and Susan G. Komen for the Cure Postdoctoral Fellowship. DRB acknowledges support from the Whitaker award administered by IIE, Thrasher Research Fund Early Career Award, and NIH T32-HL007915. We thank colleagues who kindly offered help for this study, including Wesley Baker who reviewed the rMMRO2 method.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 S. 33rd St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    So Hyun Chung, Helen Kim, David R. Busch & Arjun G. Yodh

  2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Michael D. Feldman

  3. Pathology Core Laboratory, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3615 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Daniel Martinez

  4. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Mary E. Putt

  5. Division of Neurology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3615 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    David R. Busch

  6. Department of Surgery, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Julia Tchou & Brian J. Czerniecki

  7. Department of Radiology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Mitchell D. Schnall & Mark A. Rosen

  8. Department of Medicine, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Angela DeMichele

  9. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, 209 Goergen Hall, P.O. Box 270168, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA

    Regine Choe

Authors
  1. So Hyun Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael D. Feldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Helen Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mary E. Putt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David R. Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Julia Tchou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Brian J. Czerniecki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mitchell D. Schnall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mark A. Rosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Angela DeMichele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Arjun G. Yodh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Regine Choe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to So Hyun Chung.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SHC generated the manuscript, carried out histological image analysis and ran statistical tests. MDF designed and closely oversaw all the histopathological analysis processes and participated in writing up the microscopic analysis. DM prepared digital images of histology slides, participated in designing the histological image analysis methods, provided the facility for the histological image analysis and has been involved in drafting the manuscript. HK gathered and analyzed breast cancer biomarker information and has been involved in drafting the manuscript. MEP advised and performed statistical analysis and helped in drafting and revising the manuscript. DRB participated in DOT data reconstruction and manuscript revision. JT referred subjects to this study for acquisition of clinical data, and helped in drafting and revising the manuscript, and in interpretation of data. BJC and AD referred subjects to this study, provided advice on breast cancer biology, and revised the manuscript. MDS and MAR referred and critically reviewed each subject for this study and provided a significant amount of advice on each subject’s clinical condition, provided space for all DOT measurements, and have been involved in drafting the manuscript. AGY helped supervise the overall study and helped significantly in writing the manuscript. RC developed the DOT system, reconstructed DOT physiological values, acquired in vivo data from humans, provided extensive supervision for the project, and wrote large sections of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Subjects for the correlation studies between diffuse optical tomography (DOT) parameters versus various cancer biomarkers. Table S2. Cancer and normal Ki67 values used for the calculation of tumor-to-normal ratio of Ki67. Table S3. Correlation between cancer Ki67 percent versus DOT-relative parameters. Table S4. Range of values of the biomarkers used for the correlation studies. Table S5. DOT parameters for the Ki67-positive and Ki67-negative cancer groups. Table S6. Correlation of relative nuclear compactness versus DOT parameters. Table S7. Correlation of cancer nuclear compactness versus DOT parameters. DOT three-dimensional (3-D) image reconstruction steps.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, S.H., Feldman, M.D., Martinez, D. et al. Macroscopic optical physiological parameters correlate with microscopic proliferation and vessel area breast cancer signatures. Breast Cancer Res 17, 72 (2015). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13058-015-0578-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13058-015-0578-z

Keywords

Breast Cancer Research

ISSN: 1465-542X

Contact us