Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

A selective eradication of human nonhereditary breast cancer cells by phenanthridine-derived polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
Breast Cancer Research200911:R78

  • Received: 19 February 2009
  • Published:



PARP-1 (polyADP-ribose polymerase-1) is known to be activated in response to DNA damage, and activated PARP-1 promotes DNA repair. However, a recently disclosed alternative mechanism of PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated externally regulated kinase (ERK) implicates PARP-1 in a vast number of signal-transduction networks in the cell. Here, PARP-1 activation was examined for its possible effects on cell proliferation in both normal and malignant cells.


In vitro (cell cultures) and in vivo (xenotransplants) experiments were performed.


Phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors interfered with cell proliferation by causing G2/M arrest in both normal (human epithelial cells MCF10A and mouse embryonic fibroblasts) and human breast cancer cells MCF-7 and MDA231. However, whereas the normal cells were only transiently arrested, G2/M arrest in the malignant breast cancer cells was permanent and was accompanied by a massive cell death. In accordance, treatment with a phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitor prevented the development of MCF-7 and MDA231 xenotransplants in female nude mice. Quiescent cells (neurons and cardiomyocytes) are not impaired by these PARP inhibitors.


These results outline a new therapeutic approach for a selective eradication of abundant nonhereditary human breast cancers.


  • Phen
  • Additional Data File
  • Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast
  • PARP Inhibitor
  • MDA231 Cell


PolyADP-ribose polymerases (PARPs) catalyze a posttranslational and energy-consuming modification of proteins by polyADP-ribosylation. This enzymatic reaction is initiated by ADP-ribose transferase activity, which proceeds with polymerization of ADP-riboses into long and branched polymers [1]. In the chromatin, polyADP-ribosylation apparently regulates the interaction of PARPs and their substrates with protein partners and DNA. PARP-1 is a highly conserved DNA-binding protein and the most abundant nuclear PARP. The enzyme is known to be activated in response to DNA single-strand breaks [1], and its activation induces chromatin remodeling, rendering the DNA more accessible to transcription factors and repair enzymes [1, 2].

Our recent findings in quiescent cells and in cell-free systems disclosed an alternative mechanism, inducing an intense and long-lasting activation of PARP-1 in the absence of DNA damage [3, 4]. In this process, PARP-1 interaction with phosphorylated ERK2 (externally regulated kinase) resulted in PARP-1 activation and polyADP-ribosylation in a positive-feedback mechanism that kept PARP-1 polyADP-ribosylated as long as ERK2 was phosphorylated [3]. In addition, polyADP-ribosylated PARP-1 highly augmented the activity of phosphorylated ERK, enhancing phosphorylation of ERK-targeted transcription factors, core histone acetylation, and the expression of ERK target genes, some of which are oncogenes [36]. Because ERK activity in the nucleus is a key modulator for inducing proliferation versus differentiation in a variety of cancer cells [7, 8], these findings suggest that PARP-1 activation might be a possible target for mechanisms inducing cell proliferation.

PARP inhibitors were designed to prevent PARP-1 activation in response to nicked DNA, in an attempt to suppress PARP mediated DNA repair [912]. Several generations of PARP inhibitors were designed to prevent PARP-1 activity by blocking the binding of the nicotinamide moiety of NAD+ in the catalytic site of the enzyme. PARP inhibitors differ in their chemical structure, their potency, stability, solubility in water, and apparently even in their therapeutic potential [912]. Several groups of PARP inhibitors (including phenanthridine derivatives) were designed to protect cells under stress conditions from cell death induced by a massive activation of PARP-1 (for example, stroke, inflammation; [10, 12]), or to cause cell death in malignant cells by preventing polyADP-ribosylation-dependent DNA repair [9, 11]. In accordance with this concept, PARP inhibitors were tested for their therapeutic potential in malignant cells with impaired DNA-repair machinery [13, 14] (bearing mutations in the tumor-suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 that cause an impaired DNA repair [15]) or in combination with DNA-damaging treatments [11]. However, in view of findings indicating that activated PARP-1 highly augments the activity of ERK in the nucleus even in the absence of DNA damage [3, 4], a different therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors is examined in breast cancer cells lacking BRCA mutations.

Materials and methods

Human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and MDA231 and human epithelial cells MCF-10A were supplied by ATCC Co. (American Type Culture Collection, P.O. Box 1549, Manassas, VA 20108, USA. The dealer in Israel is Almog Diagnostic & Medical equipment Ltd.). Mouse embryonic fibroblasts were prepared in the laboratory of Dr. Dantzer (Strasbourg, France).

MCF-7 and MDA231 cells were cultured in six-well multidish plates (Nunc, Thermo Fisher scientific, Reskilde, Denmark). MCF-7 and MDA231 cells were maintained in a medium containing DMEM (cat. 01055-1A), 10% Fetal bovine serum (FBS; cat. 04-124-1A), 1% L-glutamine (cat. 03-020-1B), and 1% Pen-Strep Ampho (cat. 03-033-1B) (Gibco, purchased from Rhenium, Rehovot, Israel).

MCF-10A human epithelial cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) with FBS (Gibco) 6%, EGF (100 μg/ml, Cytolab, Rehovot, Israel) 0.02%, hydrocortisone (50 μM, Sigma) 2.8%, insulin (10 mg/ml, Sigma) 0.1%, and Pen/Strep (Gibco) 1%.

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts were cultured in a medium containing DMEM (cat. 01055-1A), 10% FBS (cat. 04-121-1A), 1% L-glutamine (cat. 03-020-1B), and 1% Pen-Strep Ampho (cat. 03-033-1B) (Gibco, purchased from Rhenium, Rehovot, Israel).

Phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors

We examined the effect of phenanthridine-derived compounds that act as potent PARP inhibitors. These included PJ-34, (N-(6-oxo-5,6-dihydrophenanthridin-2-yl)-N, N-dimethyl-acetamide), Tiq-A, (4H-thieno [2,3-c]isoquinolin-5-one) and Phen, (6(5H) phenanthridinone). PJ-34 and Phen were purchased from Alexis Biochemicals (Alexis Corporation, Lausanne, Switzerland). Tiq-A was purchased from Sigma, Israel. Their chemical structure is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The chemical structures of the PARP inhibitors PJ-34, Tiq-A, and Phen.

The effect of PJ-34 on the development of MCF-7 and MDA231 xenotransplants

Xenotransplants were developed in female CD-1 nu/nu mice 5 to 6 weeks old (Charles River Labs, Sulzfeld, Germany) purchased in Israel from Harlan Labs, Jerusalem. MCF-7 and MDA231 cells were injected subcutaneously, about 107 MCF-7 or MDA231 cells in 150 μl of PBS and 150 μl of Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA, USA; In Israel, Bactolab Diagnostics). In mice treated with PJ-34, Injection was adjacent to subcutaneous osmotic pumps dripping PJ-34 by a slow release. The mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions with access to mouse chow and water ad libitum. PJ-34 (2 mM dissolved in 100 μl PBS) was inserted in subcutaneously implanted Alzet osmotic pumps, designed to release PJ-34 continuously (at about 0.6 nmol/h) for 14 days. For comparison, in the in vitro experiments, the amount of PJ-34 per dish was approximately 20 nmol. Subcutaneous implantation of these pumps was performed before injection by a veterinarian (Dr. Kastel David). All the experiments with nude mice conform with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the NIH (publication No. 85-23, revised 1996). Approval was granted by the Israeli Ministry of Health ethics review board in the Tel-Aviv University (M08033).

Cell survival in cells treated with PJ-34

MCF-7 or MDA231 cells (seeded about 500,000 cells/3-mm well in six-well plates) were treated with PJ-34 applied only once, 24 hours after seeding. In some experiments, cells were reseeded in PJ-34-free medium in 10-cm plates for colony formation. In these experiments, after 2 weeks of incubation without application of PJ-34, cells were fixed (methanol/acetic acid, 3:1), stained with crystal violet, and counted to determine cell survival.

Flow cytometry was used to monitor changes in the ploidy level of malignant and normal cells labeled with propidium Iodide (PI) staining. Counting the cells with flow cytometry in selected time periods for several hours, indicated changes in their cell cycle caused by treatment with PJ-34. Flow cytometry was performed by using a Becton Dickenson machine and the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). Untreated cells were used as controls for each cell type.


Phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors efficiently eradicated MCF-7 and MDA231 breast cancer cells without impairing human epithelial MCF-10A or mouse embryonic fibroblasts

We examined the effect of PARP inhibitors on MCF-7 and MDA231 human breast cancer cells. Cells were treated with the potent PARP inhibitors, PJ-34, Tiq-A, and Phen (Figure 1) applied only once, 24 hours after seeding. MCF-7 cells did not survive after 48 to 72 hours of incubation with 10 μM PJ-34 (Figure 2a), nor after incubation with Tiq-A (100 μM) or Phen (50 μM) (Figure 2a). At these concentrations, PJ-34, Tiq-A, and Phen inhibit the activity of PARP-1 [3, 10, 16, 17]. Significant cell death was observed even at lower concentrations of PJ-34 (Figure 2b). More than 99% of MCF-7 cells were eradicated after 48 hours of incubation with 10 μM PJ-34 (Figure 2b). The damage was irreversible. No recovery was observed in MCF-7 cells treated with PJ-34 for 48 to 72 hours and then reseeded in PJ-34-free medium and incubated for 2 additional weeks in the absence of PJ-34 (Figure 2c). Massive cell death also was observed in MDA231 incubated for 72 to 96 hours with PJ-34 applied only once, 24 hours after seeding. These cells were completely eradicated by incubation with 20-30 μM PJ-34 (Figure 2d). No recovery was observed in MDA231 cells incubated with 30 μM PJ-34 for 72 hours, after reseeding in PJ-34-free medium and incubation for 2 additional weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Eradication of MCF-7 and MDA231 human breast cancer cells by phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors. (a) MCF-7 cells were seeded (about 500,000/well) in six-well plates and incubated for 48 hours with the potent PARP inhibitors, PJ-34 (10 μM), Tiq-A (50 μM), and Phen (25 μM), each applied (a single application) 24 hours after seeding. Cells were counted and pictured under a microscope (0.02 to 0.03 mm2 per field). Control (upper left) and treated MCF-7 cells are presented, 72 hours after seeding. These representative results were repeated in five different experiments. (b) Survival rate (percentage relative to untreated cells at each time point, control) of MCF-7 breast cancer cells after incubation for 48 hours with several concentrations of PJ-34, applied (a single application) 24 hours after seeding. Each value represents the average value of five measurements in different cell cultures. (c) Colony formation (percentage relative to colony formation of untreated cells) of MCF-7 breast cancer cells reseeded and incubated for 2 additional weeks in the absence of PJ-34, 48 hours after a single application of PJ-34 at several concentrations was applied 24 hours after the initial seeding (Methods). Each value represents the average value of three measurements in three different experiments. (d) Left panel: MDA231 breast cancer cells were seeded (about 500,000/well) in six-well plates. PJ-34 was applied into the medium at the indicated final concentrations 24 hours after seeding. Cells were counted and pictured under microscope (0.02 to 0.03 mm2 per field). Right panel: Survival rate (percentage relative to untreated cells at each time point, control) of MDA231 breast cancer cells after 72 hours of incubation with several concentrations of PJ-34, applied (a single application) 24 hours after seeding. Each value is an average of three measurements obtained in three different experiments.

Flow cytometry disclosed G2/M arrest and cell death in both MCF-7 and MDA231 cells. G2/M arrest was already observed in both cell types 6 hours after treatment with 10 μM PJ-34. It was not relieved within 120 hours of the experiment and was accompanied by massive cell death (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

G2/M arrest and cell death in MCF-7 and MDA231 treated with PJ-34. The effect of PJ-34 on the cell cycle was examined with flow cytometry. PJ-34 (10 μM) was applied to both types of cells, 24 hours after seeding. Controls: Untreated MCF-7 48 hours after seeding and untreated MDA231 cells 72 hours after seeding. At the indicated time, cells were collected, permeabilized (75% ethanol in DDW), and stained with propidium iodide (PI). The effects of PJ-34 on cell eradication and the kinetics of S-phase entry and G2/M transition were evaluated by the percentages of cells at these phases. G2/M arrest accompanied by cell death was detected in both cell types after 6 hours of incubation with PJ-34. Similar results for both cell types were obtained in three different experiments.

Normal dividing cells, human epithelial cells MCF-10A (Figure 4a), were similarly arrested at G2/M (Figure 4b). Their arrest also was detected 6 hours after application of PJ-34 (10 μM). However, unlike the malignant cells, MCF10A cells were only temporarily arrested (no arrest observed after 18 hours of incubation with PJ-34), and this transient arrest was not accompanied by cell death (Figure 4a and 4b). MCF-10A cells overcame the cell-cycle arrest, and continued to proliferate as normal cells, even when incubated with the same concentrations of PJ-34 and for the same durations used to eradicate MDA231 cells (compare Figures 2d and 4a). Also, proliferation of MCF-10A cells was not significantly reduced, even after a long incubation of 14 days with 10 μM PJ-34 (Figure 4a).
Figure 4
Figure 4

PJ-34 did not eradicate normal human epithelial cells MCF-10A. (a) MCF-10A cells were seeded (about 500,000/well) in six-well plates (Methods). PJ-34 was applied once at the indicated concentrations to MCF-10A cells 24 hours after seeding. Untreated MCF-10A cells and MCF-10 cells incubated with 10, 20, and 30 μM PJ-34 for 72 hours, and MCF-10A cells incubated with 10 μM PJ-34 for 2 weeks, were pictured under a microscope. These representative results were observed in three different experiments. (b) MCF-10A cells overcame G2/M arrest induced by treatment with PJ-34 (10 μM). Cells were analyzed with flow cytometry at the indicated periods after addition of 10 μM PJ-34. G2/M arrest detected 6 hours after PJ-34 application was relieved after 18 hours. Control represents untreated MCF-10A cells 72 hours after seeding. Similar results were measured in three different experiments.

G2/M cell-cycle arrest also was detected in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Figure 5a) after 6 hours of incubation with PJ-34 (10 μM) (Figure 5b). These cells also overcame the cell-cycle arrest, and the arrest in cell cycle was not accompanied by cell death (Figure 5b).
Figure 5
Figure 5

PJ-34 did not eradicate mouse embryonic fibroblasts. (a) The effect of PJ-34 on mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) was measured after repeated applications of PJ-34 (10 μM) 24 hours and 72 hours after seeding, as indicated. MEF, untreated and incubated with PJ-34 (10 μM) for 48 hours, and MEF, untreated and incubated with 20 μM PJ-34 for 100 hours are shown. On the right are displayed cell counts (0.02 to 0.03 mm2 per field) of cells incubated with PJ-34 (10 μM, after the first application, and 20 μM, after the second application) for the indicated time periods. Each value is an average value of cells counted in five different experiments. (b) MEFs were analyzed with flow cytometry at the indicated periods after addition of PJ-34. A transient G2/M transition arrest is indicated in MEFs incubated for 6 hours with PJ-34 (10 μM). Control: Untreated MEFs 48 hours after seeding. Similar results were obtained in three different experiments.

Thus, treatment with PJ-34 induced a transient G2/M arrest in these normal proliferating cells, which was not accompanied by cell death (Figures 4 and 5), whereas the cell cycle of malignant cells MCF-7 and MDA231 was permanently arrested, and these cells were eradicated by incubation with PJ-34 applied only once 24 hours after seeding (Figures 2 and 3). An efficient eradication of MCF-7 cells was observed after 48 hours of incubation with 10 μM PJ-34, whereas MDA231 cells were massively eradicated only after 72 hours of incubation with PJ-34, 20-30 μM. Quiescent cells, brain cortical neurons, and cardiomyocytes were not impaired by incubation with the examined phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors (10 to 20 μM PJ-34, 100 μM Tiq-A, and 50 μM Phen [3, 10, 16, 17]).

PJ-34 prevented the development of MCF-7 and MDA231 xenotransplants in nude female mice

In vivo experiments were carried out in nude female mice (nu/nu) injected subcutaneously with MCF-7 or MDA231 cells (Figure 6 and Additional data file 1). To test the effect of PJ-34 on the development of xenotransplants in the injected mice, PJ-34 (2 mM dissolved in 100 μl PBS) was inserted into subcutaneously implanted osmotic pumps (Alzet) that enable its constant slow release for 14 days (Methods). In the control nude mice, pumps contained only PBS, or pumps were not implanted. On the next day, 24 hours after pump implantation, each mouse was injected subcutaneously with approximately 107 MCF-7 or MDA231 cells dispersed in Matrigel (Methods). Tumors developed within 6 to 7 weeks in the control mice injected with MCF-7 cells and within 10 days in the control mice injected with MDA231 cells. One mouse died 3 weeks after being injected with MDA231 cells. In contrast, no visible tumors developed in the PJ-34-treated mice during 4 months after injection of MCF-7 cells and during the 10 weeks after injection with MDA231 cells (Figure 6a and 6b and Additional data file 1). Importantly, the 14-day treatment with a slow release of PJ-34 did not affect the vitality, growth, development, or any other behavior of the treated mice during the follow-up periods.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Treatment with PJ-34 prevented the development of MCF-7 and MDA231 xenotransplants. (a) Xenotransplants of MCF-7 developed within 6 to 7 weeks in three mice that were not treated with PJ-34 (control mice; tumors are indicated by arrows; left). Tumors did not develop in any of the three mice treated with PJ-34 for 14 days by a slow release of PJ-34 from a subcutaneously implanted osmotic pump (Alzet; pump •; Methods) (Right). Tumors were not detected during 4 months after injection with the MCF-7 cells. Each female CD-1 nu/nu mouse was injected with about 107 MCF-7 cells collected from 80% to 90% confluent cell cultures. Cells were immersed in Matrigel/PBS (Methods). Cells were injected near the pump, one hour after pump implantation. (b) Each CD-1 nu/nu female mouse was injected with about 107 MDA231 cells collected from 80% to 90% confluent cell cultures and immersed in Matrigel/PBS (Methods). Cells were injected near the pump, 24 hours after pump implantation. Xenotransplants of MDA231 developed within 10 days in five female mice that were not treated with PJ-34 (untreated mice). Tumors did not develop in five female mice treated for 14 days with a slow release from a subcutaneously implanted osmotic pump (Alzet pump). Tumors were not detected in these mice during 10 weeks after injection with MDA231 cells and 8 weeks after the treatment with PJ-34. A detailed presentation of this experiment is included in Additional data file 1. (c) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is used for presenting tumor-free survival curves of mice injected with MCF-7 cells and mice injected with MDA231 cells, without or after treatment with PJ-34, as described earlier. The significance (log-rank significance test) was P = 0.0253 for mice injected with MCF-7 cells, and P = 0.0023 for mice injected with MDA231 cells.

After 10 weeks, we detected tumors in two of the five mice that were injected with MDA231 cells and treated with PJ-34. These tumors were of human origin, as indicated by histochemistry (labeling with mouse anti-human mitochondria antibody (Millipore/Biotest) applied after blocking ("mouse-on-mouse"; Vector Labs/Zotal)).

Tumor-free survival curves [18] for mice injected with MCF-7 cells and for mice injected with MDA231 cells are presented in Figure 6c. The effect of treatment with PJ-34 on tumor-free survival is indicated, and significance was calculated with the log-rank significance test [18].


Findings indicating that polyADP-ribosylation is required for spindle formation [19] are in accordance with the observed G2/M arrest in both normal and malignant dividing cells treated with the potent PARP inhibitor PJ-34 (Figures 3, 4b, 5b). It is puzzling how normal cells overcome the G2 arrest while malignant cells die.

G2 arrest could be induced by DNA damage in proliferating cells [20]. Because of their genomic instability and fast proliferation, malignant cells might be more susceptible to inhibition of PARP mediated DNA repair than are normal proliferating cells [13, 14]. However, eradication of MCF-7 and MDA231 cells was not shared by other non- phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors, and the examined cell lines MCF-7 and MDA231 were neither BRCA-deficient cells [21] nor PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue)-deficient cells [22], in which DNA-repair mechanisms are impaired [15, 23].

Other possible mechanisms underlying G2/M arrest implicate signal-transduction pathways involving p53, p21/WAF1, cdc25c, cdc2, and suppressed cyclin-B gene expression [20, 2426]. Stabilization of p21 could promote G2 arrest and induce cell death [25]. ERK activation also is implicated in G2/M transition control. Nuclear translocation of cyclin B/Cdc2 complex, which is required for G2/M transition, could be mediated by ERK activation [20]. Other mechanisms involving ERK activation in G2/M transition control are not fully resolved. They include autostabilization of the p21cip/cyclin D1 complex leading to cell-cycle arrest, and mechanisms promoting degradation of cyclin-dependent inhibitors such as p27kip1 [2631]. Various impairments in some of these regulatory mechanisms were detected in human cancer cell types.

Numerous primary human tumors and derived cell lines display a constitutive activation of ERK [8, 3134]. Some of them harbor mutations of the Ras protein that render it and the Raf-MEK-ERK cascade constitutively active [3537]. Constitutively activated Raf has been found in many human cancers [3537]. ERK targets are constitutively activated in B-Raf melanomas, colon cancer, PC-3 prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer cells [3739]. Growth and proliferation of the human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA231 cells are also highly dependent on ERK activity [4042].

Blocking the activity of ERK by blocking the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is one of the main targets for human cancer treatment. However, previous clinical studies showed an insufficient antitumor activity of MEK inhibitors [39], suggesting that the MEK/ERK phosphorylation pathway is resilient to diminution of the activity of MEK and can adapt rapidly to maintain nearly normal ERK activation [39].

The recently disclosed augmentation of ERK activity in the nucleus by polyADP-ribosylated PARP-1 [3], and the fact that PARP-1 silencing with targeted siRNA downregulated ERK phosphorylation in nuclei of both MCF-7 and MDA231 cells (not shown), urged us to examine PARP inhibitors for their possible effect on cell proliferation in the absence of DNA-damaging factors. However, whereas phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors efficiently arrested the cell proliferation of MCF-7 and MDA231 cancer cells, other potent PARP inhibitors did not cause a similar effect. PARP inhibitor, ABT-888 (benzimidazole-4-carboxamide) hardly affected MCF-7 and MDA231 cells (not shown), and potent PARP inhibitors efficiently eradicating BRCA mutated breast cancer cells did not similarly eradicate MCF-7 cells [13, 14] and cancer cells not carrying BRCA mutations [43]. Hence, additional features of the phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors apparently underlie their very promising potency to arrest proliferation and cause cell death in cancer cells lacking mutations that impair DNA repair, without impairing normal proliferating or quiescent cells.


Phenanthridine-derived PARP inhibitors possess a promising potency to arrest proliferation (G2/M arrest) and cause cell death in MCF-7 and MDA231 human breast cancer cells, without impairing normal proliferating human epithelial cells, fibroblasts, or quiescent cells (neurons, cardiomyocytes).



externally regulated kinase


mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase


polyADP-ribose polymerase


phosphatase and tensin homologue


mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase.



This work was supported by The Israeli Science Foundation and the Israeli Ministry of Health, grants of Prof. M. Cohen-Armon.

Authors’ Affiliations

The Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute and Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel
Cancer Research Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel
Laboratory of Molecular and Structural Biology, Ecole Superieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg, F-67400 Illkrich-Graffenstaden, France


  1. Schreiber V, Dantzer FJ-C, Ame de Murcia G: PolyADP-ribose: novel functions for an old molecule. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 517-528. 10.1038/nrm1963.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kraus WL: Transcriptional control by PARP-1:chromatin modulation, enhancer-binding, coregulation, and insulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008, 20: 294-302. 10.1016/ ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen-Armon M, Visochek L, Rozensal D, Kalal A, Geistrikh I, Klein R, Bendetz-Nezer S, Yao Z, Seger R: DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2increases Elk1 activity: a link to histone acetylation. Mol Cell. 2007, 25: 297-308. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen-Armon M: PARP-1 activation in the ERK signaling pathway. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007, 28: 556-560. 10.1016/ ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen-Armon M: PARP-1 activation mediates the expression of immediate early genes implicated in long-term memory formation. FEBS J. 2008, 275 (Suppl 1): 92-Google Scholar
  6. Carbone M, Rossi MN, Cavaldesi M, Notari A, Amati P, Maione R: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is implicated in the G0-G1 transition of resting cells. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 6083-6092. 10.1038/onc.2008.221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchwalter G, Gross C, Wasylyk B: Ets ternary complex transcription factors. Gene. 2004, 324: 1-14. 10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoshino R, Chantani Y, Yamori T, Tsuruo T, Oka H, Yoshida O, Shimada Y, Ari-i S, Wada H, Fujimoto J, Kohno M: Constitutive activation of the 41/42-kDa mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in human tumors. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 813-822. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ratnam K, Low JA: Current development of clinical inhibitors of polyADP-ribose polymerase in oncology. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 1383-1388. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiarugi A, Meli E, Calvani M, Picca R, Picca R, Baronti R, Camaioni E, Costantino G, Marinozzi M, Pellegrini-Giampietro DE, Pellicciari R, Moroni F: Novel isoquinolinone-derived inhibitors of polyADP-ribose polymerase-1: pharmacological characterization and neuroprotective effects in an in vitro model of cerebral ischemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003, 305: 943-949. 10.1124/jpet.103.048934.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Peralta-Leal A, Rodríguez-Vargas JM, Aguilar-Quesada R, Rodríguez MI, Linares JL, de Almodóvar MR, Oliver JF: PARP inhibitors: new partners in the therapy of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009, 47: 13-26. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jagtap P, Szabó C: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the therapeutic effects of its inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Disc. 2005, 4: 421-440. 10.1038/nrd1718.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, Kyle S, Meuth M, Curtin NJ, Helleday T: Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005, 434: 913-917. 10.1038/nature03443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt ANJ, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, Santarosa M, Dillon KJ, Hickson I, Knights C, Martin NM, Jackson SP, Smith GC, Ashworth A: Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005, 434: 917-921. 10.1038/nature03445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant SG, Das R, Cerceo CM, Rubinstein WS, Latimer JJ: Elevated levels of somatic mutation in a manifesting BRCA1 mutation carrier. Pathol Oncol Res. 2007, 13: 276-283. 10.1007/BF02940305.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen-Armon M, Visochek L, Katzoff A, Levitan D, Susswein AJ, Klein R, Valbrun M, Schwartz JH: Long-term memory requires polyADP-ribosylation. Science. 2004, 304: 1820-1823. 10.1126/science.1096775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Visochek L, Vulih I, Steingart RA, Klein R, Priel E, Gozes I, Cohen-Armon M: PolyADP-ribosylation is involved in neurotrophic activity. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 7420-7428. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0333-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrington D: Linear rank tests in survival analysis. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. 2005, New York: Wiley Interscience, DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a11047Google Scholar
  19. Chang P, Jacobson MK, Mitchison TJ: Poly(ADP-ribose)is required for spindle assembly and structure. Nature. 2004, 432: 645-649. 10.1038/nature03061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Stark GR, Taylor WR: Control of the G2/M transition. Mol Biotechnol. 2006, 32: 227-248. 10.1385/MB:32:3:227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fustier P, Le Corre L, Chalabi N, Vissac-Sabatier C, Communal Y, Bignon Y-J, Bernard-Gallon DJ: Resveratrol increases BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA expression in breast tumour cell lines. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 168-172. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600983.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu K, Toral-Barza L, Discafani C, Zhang W-G, Skotnicki J, Frost P, Gibbons JJ: mTOR, a novel target in breast cancer: the effect of CCI-779, an mTOR inhibitor, in preclinical models of breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2001, 8: 249-258. 10.1677/erc.0.0080249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendes-Pereira AM, Martin SA, Brough R, McCarthy A, Taylor JR, Kim J-S, Waldman T, Lord CJ, Ashworth A: Synthetic lethal targeting of PTENmutant cells with PARP inhibitors. EMBO Mol Med. 2009, 1: 315-322. 10.1002/emmm.200900041. View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Yoshida M, Matsui Y, Iizuka A, Ikarashi Y: G2-phase arrest through p21(WAF1/Cip1) induction and cdc2 repression by gnidimacrin in human hepatoma HLE cells. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29: 1349-1354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Abbas T, Dutta A: p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple Activities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 400-414. 10.1038/nrc2657.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Nigam N, Prasad S, George J, Shukla Y: Lupeol induces p53 and cyclin-B-mediated G2/M arrest and targets apoptosis through activation of caspase in mouse skin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009, 381: 253-258. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Aaltonen K, Amini R-M, Heikkilä P, Aittomäki K, Tamminen A, Nevanlinna H, Blomqvist C: High cyclin B1 expression is associated with poor survival in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009, 100: 1055-1060. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604874.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Chambard J-C, Lefloch R, Pouyssegur J, Lenormand P: ERK implication in cell cycle regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1773: 1299-1310. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.11.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitmarsh AJ, Davis RJ: Transcription factor AP-1 regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways. J Mol Med. 1996, 74: 589-607. 10.1007/s001090050063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaulian E, Karin M: AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 2390-2400. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Milde-Langosch K: The Fos family of transcription factors and their role in tumourigenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41: 2449-2461. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Brunet A, Roux D, Lenomand P, Dowd S, Keyse S, Pouyssegur J: Nuclear translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for growth factor-induced gene expression and cell cycle entry. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 664-674. 10.1093/emboj/18.3.664.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Chalmers CJ, Gilly R, March HN, Balmanno K, Cook SJ: The duration of ERK1/2 activity determines the activation of c-Fos and Fra-1 and the composition and quantitative transcriptional output of AP-1. Cell Signal. 2007, 19: 695-704. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Balmanno K, Cook SJ: Sustained MAP kinase activation is required for the expression of cyclin D1, p21 and a subset of AP-1 proteins in CCL39 cells. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 3085-3097. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202647.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W, Davis N, Dicks E, Ewing R, Floyd Y, Gray K, Hall S, Hawes R, Hughes J, Kosmidou V, Menzies A, Mould C, Parker A, Stevens C, Watt S, Hooper S, Wilson R, Jayatilake H, Gusterson BA, Cooper C, Shipley J, et al: Mutations of the B-RAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002, 417: 949-954. 10.1038/nature00766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Karasarides M, Chiloeches A, Hayward R, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Scanlon I, Friedlos F, Ogilvie L, Hedley D, Martin J, Marshall CJ, Springer CJ, Marais R: B-RAF is a therapeutic target in melanoma. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 6292-6298. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mercer KE, Pritchard CA: Raf proteins and cancer: B-Raf is identified as a mutational target. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003, 1653: 25-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan X, Egami H, Abe M, Nazawa F, Hirota M, Ogawa M: Involvement of MMP-7 in invasion of pancreatic cancer cells through activation of the EGFR mediated MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway. J Clin Pathol. 2005, 58: 1242-1248. 10.1136/jcp.2004.025338.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rinehart J, Adjei AA, LoRusso PMD, Hecht RJ, Natale RB, Hamid O, Varterasian M, Asbury P, Kaldjian EP, Gulyas S, Mitchell DY, Herrera R, Sebolt-Leopold JS, Meyer MB: Multicenter phase II study of the oral MEK inhibitor, CI-1040, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 4456-4462. 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Duan R, Xie W, Burghardt RC, Safe S: Estrogen receptor-mediated activation of the serum response element in MCF-7 cells through MAPK-dependent phosphorylation of Elk1. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 11590-11598. 10.1074/jbc.M005492200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu C, Shen Q, DuPre E, Kim H, Hilsenbeck S, Brown PH: cFos is critical for MCF-7 breast cancer cell growth. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 6516-6524. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208661.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Camirand A, Zakikhani M, Young F, Pollak M: Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor signaling enhances growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic effects of gefitinib (Iressa) in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: R570-R579. 10.1186/bcr1028.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M, Mortimer P, Swaisland H, Lau A, O'Connor MJ, Ashworth A, Carmichael J, Kaye SB, Schellens JH, de Bono JS: Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 123-134. 10.1056/NEJMoa0900212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Inbar-Rozensal; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.